Journal Home
Search for

Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 1-2 (1 February 2010)

1 of 66 View next.

USPSTF: Start Obesity Management at Age 6

JEFF EVANS

Article Outline

Survey: Physicians May Balk at Recs

Copyright

New recommendations issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force advise that children aged 6 years and older should be screened for obesity using body mass index calculations, and should be offered or referred to services that provide intensive counseling and behavioral interventions to promote improvements in their weight status.

The task force found enough evidence to rule that the overall benefit is moderate for screening children in that age range and for offering or referring children to moderate- to high-intensity intervention programs (Pediatrics 2010;125:361–7).

Dr. Ned Calonge, the USPSTF chair, said in an interview that many pediatric care providers have been reluctant to perform screening for overweight and obesity and to refer patients for treatment because of “a real sense that it doesn't work.” But “the good news is that we actually have evidence that this [recommendation]—if there is a referral center available—actually works.”

Dr. Calonge said it should be easy to screen for overweight and obesity with BMI calculations because clinicians routinely measure height and weight at office visits, but he recognized that it will be difficult for some clinicians to offer counseling and behavioral services and some patients will not be able to afford the interventions without adequate insurance coverage.

The evidence in support of the efficacy of moderate- to high-intensity interventions should help to change insurance coverage for them, said Dr. Calonge, chief medical officer of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.

To fit screening and counseling referrals into an already busy office visit, Dr. Calonge said he tells clinicians that they “should focus on the anticipatory guidance for which we have good evidence of efficacy [for interventions], and it could take the place of guidance that we don't have evidence for.”

When the USPSTF last conducted a review of the available evidence in 2005, the group found adequate evidence to recommend BMI as an acceptable measure for identifying children and adolescents with excess weight but did not make screening or treatment recommendations. Since then, nine additional interventional trials in children aged 4–18 years have been reported. These new studies have shown that treatment for obesity, especially comprehensive treatment, can be effective and has effects that extend beyond the immediate intervention time period.

The USPSTF did not find sufficient evidence for screening children younger than age 6 years. This is “surprising” according to Dr. Sandra G. Hassink, a member of the AAP board of directors, because “in recent years, universal screening for overweight and obesity has become standard of care in pediatrics and has been recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the [American Medical Association] Expert Committee.”

In 2007, an expert committee organized by the AMA made recommendations similar to those from the USPSTF. The association advised calculating BMI, assessing patients for medical and behavioral risks for obesity, and using a stepwise approach to treatment that includes counseling, a structured weight management plan, and a comprehensive intervention delivered by multidisciplinary teams with expertise in childhood obesity.

The AAP later endorsed the AMA's recommendations, adding that BMI should be plotted annually for all patients aged 2 years and older.

By limiting its recommendations to children aged 6 years and older, the task force “falls short of the mark in not recognizing the developmental trajectory of obesity in childhood,” Dr. Hassink of A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del., wrote in an editorial (Pediatrics 2010;125:387–8).

The outcomes of interventions appeared to be related to the level of intensity of the intervention.

In comprehensive, moderate- to high-intensity behavioral interventions, investigators reported modest improvements in weight status. These trials found 1.9–3.3 kg/m2 declines in mean BMI 6–12 months after starting treatment. Based on the 50th percentile for height, a decline in BMI of 3.3 kg/m2 is equivalent to an 8-year-old boy losing 13 pounds, a 16-year-old girl losing about 19 pounds, and a 16-year-old boy losing 22–23 pounds (Pediatrics 2010;125:361–7).

Neither Dr. Hassink nor any of the task force members had relevant conflict disclosures.


View full-size image.

Courtesy Jan Stapleman, Communications, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment


Survey: Physicians May Balk at Recs 

return to Article Outline

Implementation of the USPSTF's childhood obesity screening and management recommendations will be an uphill battle, if a recent survey of AAP members is a true indication.

Respondents said that they don't make assessments with BMI and only a minority believe in the effectiveness of treatment or have referral services for weight management centers available in their area, reported Dr. Jonathan D. Klein of the University of Rochester (N.Y.) and his colleagues (Pediatrics 2010;125:265–72).

They mailed the survey in 2006 to a nationally representative sample of 1,622 members. The results are based on the responses of 677 actively practicing primary care providers.

Only 52% reported assessing BMI percentile for children older than 2 years and only 23% believed that there are good treatment strategies for overweight. Less than half said they are able to make referrals to interventional programs. It also was notable that providers who had attended continuing medical education sessions on overweight or obesity within the past 3 years were significantly more familiar with AAP guidelines on obesity screening and treatment. The study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

PII: S0300-7073(10)70096-7

doi:10.1016/S0300-7073(10)70096-7

1 of 66 View next.