News

Number, not level, of positive antibodies predicts mortality in early RA


 

FROM ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY

References

Seropositivity for both rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody was associated with increased mortality, compared with single positivity or seronegativity in patients with early inflammatory arthritis in two large, independent observational cohorts.

However, higher levels of the antibodies did not appear to be associated with early deaths as the influence of increasing antibody level was not consistent in the two cohorts, Dr. Jennifer H. Humphreys of the University of Manchester (England) and her colleagues reported (Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014 Dec. 4 [doi:10.1186/s13075-014-0483-3]).

Dr. Jennifer H. Humphreys

Dr. Jennifer H. Humphreys

Among 3,053 patients in the Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR) cohort and 1,909 in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) cohort, double antibody positivity – which occurred in 35% and 42% of patients in the cohorts, respectively – was associated with excess mortality (adjusted hazard ratios, 1.35 and 1.57). However, when antibody status was negative, low-positive, or high-positive, findings in one cohort were not replicated in the other. For example, there was a marked difference in rheumatoid factor high and low positivity in the NOAR cohort (adjusted HRs of 0.80 and 1.49, respectively), but not in the EAC cohort (adjusted HRs of 1.62 and 1.63, respectively), the investigators said.

Median patient age at symptom onset was 56 years in NOAR and 54 years in EAC, and 65% and 63% of subjects in the cohorts, respectively, were women. They were followed for a mean of 11.8 years and 8.5 years, until death or censor date, and analyses were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, inflammatory markers, and year of enrollment.

The findings suggest that in patients presenting with early rheumatoid arthritis, mortality risk may be better assessed by the number of positive antibodies than by the antibody levels, the investigators concluded.

NOAR is funded by Arthritis Research UK grants, as is Dr. Humphreys. The current study was also funded by the European Community Seventh Framework Program FP7 and a Vidi grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. The authors reported having no other disclosures.

Recommended Reading

Novel program improves RA care, cuts costs
MDedge Family Medicine
Treat-to-target approach cuts mortality risk in RA patients
MDedge Family Medicine
RA draft guidelines: Treat to target
MDedge Family Medicine
RA increases mortality, particularly for respiratory causes, in women
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Herpes zoster vaccination: Is it safe for rheumatology patients over age 30 on biologics?
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Collaborative clinic aims at heart of CVD prevention in rheumatic diseases
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: DAGR may prove to be safer alternative to glucocorticoids
MDedge Family Medicine
Nonsteroidal ‘DAGR’ looks sharp against RA
MDedge Family Medicine
Tapering TNFi’s safe and much cheaper in RA
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA issues new pregnancy/lactation drug label standards
MDedge Family Medicine