NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – A novel selective estrogen–receptor modulator called ospemifene was significantly more effective than placebo for reducing symptoms of vaginal dryness and dyspareunia in a study of 919 postmenopausal women.
"Despite its negative impact on sexual function, psychosocial well-being, and partner relationships, vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) frequently goes untreated," said Dr. David Portman of the Columbus (Ohio) Center for Women’s Health Research.
Only estrogen-based treatments have been approved in the United States to treat VVA in postmenopausal women, but concerns about the effects of estrogen on breast and endometrial tissue have prompted doctors and patients to seek alternatives, Dr. Portman said at the annual meeting of the North American Menopause Society.
"Despite its negative impact on sexual function, psychosocial well-being, and partner relationships, vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) frequently goes untreated."
"We do need to find alternatives because many of our patients still have concerns even with local estrogen," he emphasized.
Ospemifene (OSP), a selective estrogen–receptor modulator (SERM) – also referred to as a nonsteroidal estrogen–receptor agonist/antagonist – is distinct from other SERMs because its estrogenic activity occurs on the vaginal epithelium, "but not on the endometrium," said Dr. Portman.
Previous studies have shown that ospemifene is well tolerated, with a favorable pharmacologic profile in postmenopausal women with VVA, he added.
In a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III parallel group study, Dr. Portman and his colleagues assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ospemifene for women with moderate to severe vaginal dryness or moderate to severe dyspareunia. VVA and dyspareunia symptoms and severity were self-reported, and use of a nonhormonal vaginal lubricant was permitted as needed. Demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups.
The women ranged from 40 to 80 years of age at baseline. Those with a body mass index of 37 kg/m2 or greater were excluded, as were those with clinically significant abnormal gynecologic findings other than vaginal atrophy and those using hormonal medications or other products with possible estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects within a timeframe too close to the study screening.
A total of 314 postmenopausal women who reported vaginal dryness as their primary symptom were randomized to 60 mg of OSP orally each morning or a placebo.
In the intent-to-treat population, the change in the vaginal dryness severity score improved in the OSP group vs. the placebo group (–1.3 vs. –1.1). In addition, the percentages of superficial and parabasal cells were significantly different in the OSP group vs. the placebo group (12% vs. 3% and –32% vs. –4%, respectively). Measuring these types of cells indicates changes in the vaginal microflora, which have been shown to affect vaginal dryness and pain.
The mean change in vaginal pH was –1.01 in the OSP group, compared with –0.25 in the placebo group, respectively.
An additional 605 women who reported dyspareunia as their primary symptom were randomized to 60 mg OSP orally each morning or a placebo.
In the intent-to-treat population, the change in the dyspareunia severity score improved in the OSP group vs. the placebo group (–1.5 vs. –1.2, P = .0001), a significant difference. In addition, the percentages of superficial cells and parabasal cells were significantly different in the OSP vs. the placebo groups (12% vs. 2% and –40% vs. 0%, respectively). The mean change in vaginal pH also differed significantly between the OSP and placebo groups (–1.0 vs. –0.06, respectively).
Submitting your vote...
Cancer